Uber Fined $59 Million For Failing To Reply Questions About Sexual Assault Instances

Illustration for article titled Uber Fined $59 Million For Failing To Answer Questions About Sexual Assault Cases

Picture: Justin Sullivan / Workers (Getty Photographs)


California regulators slapped Uber with a $59 million effective on Monday after they decided that the corporate had didn’t adequately reply to questions on a report detailing hundreds of sexual assaults that occurred throughout journeys taken with the corporate’s ride-hailing platform.

In accordance with the San Francisco Chronicle, the order stipulates that Uber could have 30 days to repay the effective or else face the specter of having to halt operations in California altogether till the cash is paid and regulators’ excellent questions are glad.

The dispute reportedly stems from calls for made by regulators on the California Public Utilities Fee, who’re calling for Uber to show over detailed data on the sexual assault circumstances and harassment claims amongst its drivers and riders. In a ruling on Monday on behalf of the CPUC — a regulatory physique that usually investigates transportation firms that function inside the state — a decide declared that the $59 million determine had been determined upon by levying a $7,500 effective for every particular occasion of Uber refusing to reply a query through the course of.


In accordance with the 84-page, first-of-its-kind security report Uber launched in December 2019, the corporate had logged three,045 sexual assaults and 9 murders throughout experience shares within the US through the full size of 2018 and a part of 2017.

However Uber has repeatedly cited a want to defend victims’ privateness in denying the requests for extra data, and several other victims’ advocacy teams have supported that hesitation, claiming that there’s no assure that data on the victims can be secure with regulators, even below seal.

In an announcement supplied to The Verge, Uber stated that the CPUC has been “insistent in its calls for that we launch the full names and contact data of sexual assault survivors with out their consent,” a “stunning violation of privateness,” that the corporate opposes. 

Throughout Monday’s ruling, nonetheless, a decide stated that arguments about privateness concerns little amounted to little greater than “specious authorized roadblocks” meant to “frustrate the Fee’s potential to assemble data,” and beneficial that Uber work with the CPUC to create “a code or another signifier somewhat than a sufferer’s identify.