Nigerian Shippers Council protest indiscriminate expenses by multinational transport companies

A Nigerian port

The Nigerian Authorities has taken a daring step to protest indiscriminate expenses by multinational transport companies, who’ve continued to slam big surcharges on Nigerian-bound cargoes.

The surcharge about 400 p.c enhance from the common expenses, in response to stakeholders, would cripple industries, declare jobs, and shrink income accruable to the Authorities.


Led by the Nigerian Shippers Council (NSC), the stakeholders underneath the aegis of the Producers Affiliation of Nigeria (MAN); Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Business (LCCI); the Nigerian Affiliation of Chambers of Commerce, Business, Mines, and Agriculture (NACCIMA), and the Nigerian transport neighborhood met Wednesday, in Lagos, to withstand the arbitrary expenses.

The present expenses of the 2020 peak interval are about between $1,000 and $1,500 per twenty-foot equal unit (TEU) by transport companies, which is over 400 p.c above the earlier $200 freight cost per TEU.

Govt Secretary, NSC, Hassan Bello, mentioned: “the cost is frightening. If a Nigeria-bound container is charged as a lot as $1,000, then the nationwide economic system is in bother.”
Bello argued that the fees would result in a “spiral inflation price on the economic system; cargoes shall be deserted on the ports; it means job losses and plenty of shippers shall be out of enterprise.”


He described the fees as “astronomic, unjustified, not notified, and discriminatory. That is in opposition to truthful commerce facilitation guidelines.

“Now we have additionally written to the Ministry of Transportation to escalate it to the Ministry of Commerce, and the Ministry of Overseas Affairs, and the Federal Authorities will protest the fees.

“Now we have been having surcharges within the vary of $200 to $400, however a 400 p.c enhance and there was no time restrict. It’s already going to 9 months shouldn’t be what any economic system can address. This will cripple the economic system,” Bello mentioned.


Managing Director, Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), Hadiza Bala Usman expressed disappointment with the fees, warning that it’d end in extra cargoes being deserted on the ports.

Usman, who was represented by the Common Supervisor, Tariff and Billings, Abubakar Garba Umar, mentioned: “If the importers are charged so excessive, they usually deserted them within the port, NPA will lose income, and it will scale back effectivity and turnaround of ships to Nigerian port.”

The Director-Common, LCCI, Muda Yusuf, vowed that industries would resist the fees, as a result of this isn’t the most effective of time for companies typically.


MAN consultant, Olufemi Immanuel, reiterating no increment in expenses, mentioned that is coming at a time when producers are working with much less employees, much less uncooked supplies, and decrease revenue, including: “the worth of products will skyrocket and the price of transport shall be insufferable.”

Consultant of NACCIMA, Margaret Orakwusi, mentioned the surcharge would have an effect on commerce critically. “Our members borrowed big quantities of cash to import gadgets they usually slammed this big quantity, then it will have an effect on the banks too.”

Massive scale importers corresponding to Dangote Group and Promasidor, additionally bemoaned the arbitrary expenses by transport firms, expressing readiness to protest in opposition to it with all equipment.


Delivery firms which have been fingered within the arbitrary expenses embody, Cosco, Maersk, MSC, CMA CGM, Hapag Lloyd, and Evergreen transport.

On his half, Vice President, Affiliation of Nigerian Licensed Customs Brokers (ANLCA), Kayode Farinto, urges collaboration with ECOWAS on the arbitrary expenses. “It should have an effect on our economic system significantly as a result of Nigeria is an import-dependent economic system.”   President, Nationwide Affiliation of Authorities Authorized Freight Forwarders (NAGAFF), Improve Uche, insisted that the surcharge is unacceptable, as the brand new regular doesn’t give room for acceptability of such expenses.