When is the final time the extra time you acquired was greater than your wage? Test to see what public workers earned in extra time now on

Bridgewater Courier Information


A person convicted of sexually assaulting his stepdaughter in Middlesex County for practically a decade has misplaced an enchantment of his conviction.

The person, whose identify is being withheld to guard the identification of the sufferer, sought post-conviction aid for his second-degree sexual assault conviction, for which he was sentenced to seven years in jail.

In his enchantment, the person argued he had ineffective authorized illustration throughout his trial. The appellate courtroom, nevertheless, disagreed.


The person started sexually abusing his stepdaughter when she was eight years outdated and continued till she was 17, in accordance with courtroom paperwork.

In March 2010, a grand jury returned an indictment charging him with two counts of first-degree aggravated sexual assault, two counts of second-degree sexual assault, two counts of second-degree endangering the welfare of a kid, and first-degree endangering the welfare of a kid.

READ: Bloomfield man convicted of murdering Old Bridge woman loses appeal


His first trial in 2011 resulted in a hung jury.

In July 2012, his retrial resulted in an acquittal of all counts aside from one depend of second-degree sexual assault. He was sentenced to seven years in jail in December of that very same 12 months.

The person, in his enchantment, claimed that his trial lawyer was ineffective as a result of the lawyer didn’t problem Youngster Sexual Abuse Lodging Syndrome witnesses, which is a syndrome theorized in 1983 to elucidate how youngsters reply to being sexually abused.


In 2018, the New Jersey Supreme Court docket dominated that witnesses might now not testify in sexual abuse instances concerning the Youngster Sexual Abuse Lodging Syndrome as a result of, the courtroom discovered, the idea is “not usually accepted by the scientific group,” in accordance with the ruling.

Regardless, the appellate courtroom mentioned the person’s arguments have been fully with out advantage.

The appellate courtroom famous that in the course of the retrial, the person’s lawyer, who he claimed to be ineffective, managed to beat seven of the eight costs in opposition to him.


The judges discovered that the person couldn’t show his lawyer was poor or “made errors so severe that counsel was not functioning because the ‘counsel’ assured the defendant by the Sixth Modification,” in accordance with the ruling.

The judges additionally discovered that the person couldn’t show “affordable likelihood that, however for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the results of the continuing would have been completely different.”  


The person was launched from jail in June 2018 after serving 5 years and 6 months.

Electronic mail:

Nick Muscavage is a watchdog reporter for the Courier Information, Dwelling Information Tribune and To get limitless entry to his investigative work that has uncovered wrongdoing and adjusted state regulation, please subscribe or activate your digital account today.


Learn or Share this story: